Ask not what the state can do for you ….
I had an interesting conversation yesterday with a number of people trying to work out how to respond to the idea of the Big Society. As I said yesterday, the report on Monday of the ACEVO Commission on the Big Society is likely to provide plenty of ammunition for those critical of the implementation of the idea, but this conversation was more at the level of principle.
Essentially the Big Society contains two ideas, one which is traditionally associated with the right and one which is more comfortable to the left. The former comprises a critique of the state, the latter a recognition that people should be expected to act in ways which do not simply avoid harming others but contribute to the public good. A problem for the right is that most evidence suggests civil society tends to be stronger in countries which have a relatively generous welfare state. A problem for the left is that in practice the way public services are organised – at least in England – too rarely creates feelings of empowerment among either staff or the public.
Part of the intellectual terrain over the next few years will therefore be a tussle between Conservatives seeking to show how a withdrawing state has created spaces for community initiatives while a left in search of a new narrative will need to demonstrate it has moved beyond the rampant statism of the Brown years and has credible plans for a strong, efficient and enabling public sector. The interesting thing right now is how weak, and lacking in much more than anecdote, both arguments sound.
But the thing that really stuck me was when someone quoted from the socialist thinker RH Tawney, who said in 1931 of the first Labour Government that ‘it asked too little and promised too much’ (when I checked the quote I found it had been used in a speech last year by David Miliband).
One of the things that David Cameron’s Government has in common with Margaret Thatcher’s is a message that people need to change. For Mrs Thatcher it was that people needed to be independent and enterprising, from Mr Cameron it is that people need to be more responsible and community-minded. In contrast Labour – whose ideology should have at its heart the idea of social citizenship – lacked any such over-arching exhortation. Instead Labour’s message was ‘leave it to us, we will sort it out with policies, plans, targets and tax credits’ – interspersed with occasionally delivering a shrill and populist telling off to anti-social youths or the work-shy.
It is not easy to challenge people to be wise and responsible citizens, especially with a 24 hour media constantly on the lookout for an excuse to accuse politicians of pomposity or hypocrisy (witness this excruciating interview with Francis Maude). But it is an essential task of political leadership and will be vital if the Coalition is to have a positive tale to tell through the coming years of austerity or if Labour is to find a way of connecting with people beyond its Northern heartlands.
Comments
2 Comments on Ask not what the state can do for you ….
-
Zio Bastone on
Wed, 11th May 2011 2:20 pm
-
Neil McNaughton on
Wed, 11th May 2011 3:33 pm
‘The [right wing stance] comprises a critique of the state, the [left wing stance] a recognition that people should be expected to act in ways which do not simply avoid harming others but contribute to the public good.’
Broad brushes are apt to smudge and obscure rather than highlight unfortunately. Marx offered a critique of state capitalism, elaborated in various ways by those he influenced whilst the idea of state corporatism was something historically associated with the right.
It is an interesting question whether you can change the culture in such a short time. Indeed, can the state promote any cultural change or can this only happen through cultural institutions, notably education ? After all, American communitarianism has its origins in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries !
It seems to me that there is already a strong ‘Big Society’ culture in Britain so the withdrawal of the state from many local services and activities may be fighting against a ‘diminishing returns’ situation. If community activism were weak, perhaps state withdrawl might work, but it is already at a high level, so how much more can be tapped into ? People are also not stupid and suspect, perhaps with justification, that the Big Society agenda is really a money saving device. The story of the police officer who was made redundant then asked to volunteer as a special constable was extremely damaging and has become common currency in Daily Mail land (Finchley) already.
It therefore seems axiomatic to me that the state will have to promote localism and that will cost money. As this will not be forthcoming the propsects look bleak.
Now promoting corporate responsibility – locally and nationally – that is a different matter………….
Tell me what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!
RSA Animate
RSA Mobile
RSA Comment- RSA Projects Blogs
RSA Bookshop
The RSA Bookshop, in partnership with Blackwell's the UK's leading academic bookseller, offers Fellows and friends an opportunity to purchase books and to explore our speakers’ ideas in greater detail. Visit the RSA Bookshop.