<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David, meet Michael</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/politics/david-meet-michael/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/politics/david-meet-michael/</link>
	<description>Politics, brains, social action and the day to day life of the RSA’s chief executive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:15:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: My response to Michael Gove&#8217;s response to my response to his speech &#124; Matthew Taylor's blog</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/politics/david-meet-michael/comment-page-1/#comment-4770</link>
		<dc:creator>My response to Michael Gove&#8217;s response to my response to his speech &#124; Matthew Taylor's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/?p=2418#comment-4770</guid>
		<description>[...] into university. I interpret Michael’s answer as a ‘yes’. Which, again, is fine, although, as I have suggested before, it doesn’t seem to be quite the position being espoused by Conservative HE spokesman David [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] into university. I interpret Michael’s answer as a ‘yes’. Which, again, is fine, although, as I have suggested before, it doesn’t seem to be quite the position being espoused by Conservative HE spokesman David [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free call India &#62;&#62; Making free call from US to ...</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/politics/david-meet-michael/comment-page-1/#comment-3889</link>
		<dc:creator>Free call India &#62;&#62; Making free call from US to ...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/?p=2418#comment-3889</guid>
		<description>..]another must read source of information on this subjectis ,www.matthewtaylorsblog.com,..]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..]another must read source of information on this subjectis ,www.matthewtaylorsblog.com,..]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthewtaylor</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/politics/david-meet-michael/comment-page-1/#comment-3524</link>
		<dc:creator>matthewtaylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/?p=2418#comment-3524</guid>
		<description>Thanks Phil, Joe and Saboohi. This is one of those debates that really gets people going. My own soggy liberal position is that HE expansion has been a largely successful social experiment. But that there is much to learn from what has worked well and what has not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Phil, Joe and Saboohi. This is one of those debates that really gets people going. My own soggy liberal position is that HE expansion has been a largely successful social experiment. But that there is much to learn from what has worked well and what has not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthewtaylor</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/politics/david-meet-michael/comment-page-1/#comment-3523</link>
		<dc:creator>matthewtaylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/?p=2418#comment-3523</guid>
		<description>Fair point. I guess I meant laissez faire in the sense that if Universities want to teach it and students want to study it what&#039;s the problem. But you are right about the public subsidy aspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point. I guess I meant laissez faire in the sense that if Universities want to teach it and students want to study it what&#8217;s the problem. But you are right about the public subsidy aspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ad</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/politics/david-meet-michael/comment-page-1/#comment-3503</link>
		<dc:creator>ad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/?p=2418#comment-3503</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;David Willetts espouses a laissez faire, expansionary view of post compulsory education&lt;/i&gt;

Is he planning to end government subsidies for it, or has the phrase &quot; laissez faire&quot; been redefined?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>David Willetts espouses a laissez faire, expansionary view of post compulsory education</i></p>
<p>Is he planning to end government subsidies for it, or has the phrase &#8221; laissez faire&#8221; been redefined?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

