<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welfare reform &#8211; our confused attitudes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/politics/welfare-reform-our-confused-attitudes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/politics/welfare-reform-our-confused-attitudes/</link>
	<description>Politics, brains, social action and the day to day life of the RSA’s chief executive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:39:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: matthew taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/politics/welfare-reform-our-confused-attitudes/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/?p=763#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Thanks for these comments. Marbury is right that there is a more humdrum explanation for people&#039;s resentment, although I still think we would expect people to be more intolerant of claimants when there are loads of vacanices to fill.    Michael, I love the RSA Books of the Year idea - which i will now feature in my blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for these comments. Marbury is right that there is a more humdrum explanation for people&#8217;s resentment, although I still think we would expect people to be more intolerant of claimants when there are loads of vacanices to fill.    Michael, I love the RSA Books of the Year idea &#8211; which i will now feature in my blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fewer people agree with you than you think &#171; Local Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/politics/welfare-reform-our-confused-attitudes/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Fewer people agree with you than you think &#171; Local Democracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/?p=763#comment-208</guid>
		<description>[...] involves squaring a number of unsquareable circles. Here&#8217;s the RSA&#8217;s Matthew Taylor on cognitive dissonance and the rose coloured mirror. People - the voters (trans: you and I) don&#8217;t recognise the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] involves squaring a number of unsquareable circles. Here&#8217;s the RSA&#8217;s Matthew Taylor on cognitive dissonance and the rose coloured mirror. People &#8211; the voters (trans: you and I) don&#8217;t recognise the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/politics/welfare-reform-our-confused-attitudes/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/?p=763#comment-206</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always thought of hate as externalised self-loathing (e.g. homophobics - who are, science says, disproportionately excited by homosexual pornography). As Herman Hesse said &quot;If you hate a person, you hate something in him that is part of yourself. What isn&#039;t part of ourselves doesn&#039;t disturb us.&quot; It sounds like you might agree.

Also, I&#039;m surprised you didn&#039;t mention explicitly the fundamental attribution error or actor-observer bias: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always thought of hate as externalised self-loathing (e.g. homophobics &#8211; who are, science says, disproportionately excited by homosexual pornography). As Herman Hesse said &#8220;If you hate a person, you hate something in him that is part of yourself. What isn&#8217;t part of ourselves doesn&#8217;t disturb us.&#8221; It sounds like you might agree.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t mention explicitly the fundamental attribution error or actor-observer bias: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marbury</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/politics/welfare-reform-our-confused-attitudes/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Marbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/?p=763#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Um, hang on a minute. I&#039;m not sure we need to employ social psychology here, brilliant though it is (is cognitive dissonance a posh way of saying, some people - not me or you, obviously - are out of touch with reality?). If I get more pissed off with people taking advantage of the benefit system, the more people lose their jobs, does that make me disdainful/delusional/hypocritical? Or is it a logical response to the fact that when more and more people are in real need, it&#039;s doubly outrageous that some people are playing the system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, hang on a minute. I&#8217;m not sure we need to employ social psychology here, brilliant though it is (is cognitive dissonance a posh way of saying, some people &#8211; not me or you, obviously &#8211; are out of touch with reality?). If I get more pissed off with people taking advantage of the benefit system, the more people lose their jobs, does that make me disdainful/delusional/hypocritical? Or is it a logical response to the fact that when more and more people are in real need, it&#8217;s doubly outrageous that some people are playing the system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael, in UK</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/politics/welfare-reform-our-confused-attitudes/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael, in UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/?p=763#comment-204</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great description of cognitive dissonance and its effects, thank you.
I&#039;d be interested to know your  &quot;books of the year&quot; - non-fiction and fiction.  The lists that appesar in newspapers at this time of yeat always seem to favour inviting fiction writers, and the choices are always dominated by fiction. 
I wonder if Prospect has compiled a list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great description of cognitive dissonance and its effects, thank you.<br />
I&#8217;d be interested to know your  &#8220;books of the year&#8221; &#8211; non-fiction and fiction.  The lists that appesar in newspapers at this time of yeat always seem to favour inviting fiction writers, and the choices are always dominated by fiction.<br />
I wonder if Prospect has compiled a list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

