Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose
As I approach four years at the helm of the RSA I find myself assessing progress. The Society faces vitally important decisions about its future so it’s useful to get a sense of where we are now.
A long term trend in the RSA has been to expand our research capacity. A few decades ago we didn’t really do research and even when we did it had a somewhat random feel to it. We have come a long way since then. But it is fascinating that today’s new focus, new methods and new ambition are balanced by a strong sense of continuity. For example, I have on my desk the draft report of our Tomorrow’s Investor project. In the face of the shocking fact that many private pension savers see up to 40% of their savings consumed in fees, the focus of this report is how to put in place an affordable and well governed pension scheme. There is even an intimation that if Government rules change and allowed the new scheme we are proposing to be created, the RSA could in some way be involved in establishing it. While this is a big idea and a new research area, longer standing Fellows will see the continuity with one of the Society’s most influential projects in recent times: Tomorrow’s Company.
Another area of continuity is the RSA’s commitment to engage Fellows in projects. Not only is the Tomorrow’s Investor project overseen by a steering group made up of Fellows but the very first stage in the project – two years ago – was a kind of citizens’ jury of pensions savers largely selected from the Fellowship.
Next week will also see the publication of our report on ‘whole-person recovery’, which is, I think, an exceptional piece of work. The report breaks new ground for the RSA with a methodology which engaged up to two hundred people with drug and alcohol dependency issues in designing not only a new way of thinking about recovery but also new types of service. Not only is our model proving very interesting to central Government but is being taken up and used on the ground. But, again, there is continuity. This project emerged out of the work of our Fellow-led Commission on Drugs which was published to widespread acclaim back in 2006.
The same pattern is repeated elsewhere. Our Academy is going great guns and we are thinking about the possibility of having a close relationship with more schools. The Academy is developing the Opening Minds approach, now taught in over 200 schools, which was first promulgated in a report in 1999 which was itself based on earlier work on new forms of learning, again overseen by a working group of Fellows. And today we have a research project – the area based curriculum – based in Peterborough which could in time help develop a new direction for Opening Minds. This project was high on the agenda of a very lively Fellows’ network event in Peterborough earlier this week.
Our design team continues the long tradition of our student design awards but now the emphasis on service design and what we call ‘design for resourcefulness’ (how can design not only meet needs but help people to meet their own needs).
Overall, our projects team is getting more press overage, achieving greater impact with national and local government and attracting more external funding than ever before. But the progress we are making is built on the strong foundations set by a previous generation of Trustees, Fellows and staff.
Comments
2 Comments on Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose
-
lilly on
Fri, 19th Nov 2010 12:51 am
-
oldandrew on
Fri, 19th Nov 2010 6:36 pm
Is that 21st Century Enlightenment or an alternative think-tank.
Can an organisation be so enlightened it doesn’t notice losing its soul.
I always thought there is great value in the RSA fellowship network itself and the value of working together. Tommorrows Company looks to be run by ex New Labour founders rather by RSA and its a little glossy to call it ‘the most influential project in recent times’, I would hope.
But what would i know.
The drugs project looks interesting and I genuinely look forward to that report. Drugs is certainly an area that needs 21st Century Enlightment – got to be more effective than a war on drugs.
I just don’t get why the RSA is investing its time and money in “education” projects that, when you follow the links, are simply a mixture of cliches and excuses for dumbing-down.
There is nothing new or original in any of it. I hope that, in practice, something good is coming out of it all, but I think all concerned would be best advised to get hold of a copy of “Left Back” by Diane Ravitch and ask the obvious questions:
“Has this been done before?”
“If so, how did it work out?”
(Alternatively, “Wasted: Why Education isn’t Educating” by Frank Furedi might be enlightening.)
Tell me what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!



